About Physician Case Review
Physician-led analysis, grounded in the system behind the chart.
Physician Case Review is led by Dr. Mickey Bansal, MD, FAAP, FAMIA, a physician executive and former pediatric emergency physician, dual board-certified in Pediatrics and Clinical Informatics, with more than 10 years as a physician informaticist and healthcare quality leader across leading U.S. health systems.
Clinical Medicine
Analysis anchored in clinical reasoning and the realities of patient care.
Clinical Informatics
EHR workflows, audit logs, metadata, alerts, and decision support.
Healthcare Quality
Case facts measured against policies, pathways, and quality systems.
Patient Safety
Root cause analysis, human factors, and systems thinking.
Who is Dr. Mickey Bansal?
Credentials that speak for themselves.
An award-winning, nationally recognized, double board-certified physician and healthcare informatics expert whose career blends clinical excellence, leading healthcare quality and safety initiatives, and technological innovation.
- ABP Pediatrics Board Certified
- ABPM Clinical Informatics Board Certified
- Fellow of the American Academy of Pediatrics
- Fellow of the American Medical Informatics Association
7 Epic Certifications
Hands-on command of the enterprise EHR at the center of most hospital care.
- Physician Builder: Analytics
- Cogito
- Beaker Anatomic Pathology
- Notecraft for Physician Builders
- Cosmos
- Healthy Planet
- Epic: Clinical Informaticist
Background and approach
What Dr. Bansal brings to a case.
Clinical background
Practiced pediatric emergency medicine, with direct experience in the fast-moving, high-stakes settings where much medical-legal work originates.
Informatics expertise
Board certification in Clinical Informatics, with hands-on command of Epic and enterprise EHRs, clinical workflows, decision support, audit logs, and metadata.
Quality and patient-safety leadership
More than 10 years as a physician informaticist and healthcare quality leader, in executive roles as Associate Chief Medical Officer and Chief Medical Officer, applying root cause analysis, peer review, and human-factors analysis at the system level.
Medical-legal approach
Work is delivered through the Informatics Case Reconstruction method: transparent, reproducible, and defensible, with fact, inference, and recommendation kept distinct.
Why PCR was founded
Because the printed medical record is not the complete record of care, and attorneys deserve analysis that reads the system behind the chart.
Professional standards
PCR does not provide legal advice, does not guarantee outcomes, keeps consulting and testifying roles distinct, and presents only verified credentials.