Skip to content
Physician Case Review Consult

Who we help

Defense Attorneys

Test the allegations against the system evidence.

Defending clinicians, hospitals, and systems requires more than reading the chart. It requires understanding whether the system evidence actually supports the allegation, and whether there is a legitimate explanation for the timing and documentation that a plaintiff may characterize as suspicious. Physician Case Review provides that independent, informatics-literate analysis.

How we help

What Physician Case Review does for you.

Test the allegations

Compare the claims against the native data, audit trail, and configuration history to see whether the system evidence supports, complicates, or contradicts them.

Put documentation timing in context

Late entries and amendments are frequently legitimate. Downtime, workflow, and shared workstations all shape timestamps. We explain what the metadata does and does not show.

Evaluate whether the record supports the claim

A clear-eyed read of whether alerts, results-viewing, order sets, and workflow reflect reasonable care in the environment where the decision was made.

Prepare for the informatics case

Rebuttal analysis of a plaintiff expert, and preparation for the audit-log and metadata questions that increasingly arise in discovery and at deposition.

Explain complex systems clearly

Plain-English framing and visuals that help a jury understand how the EHR and clinical workflow actually functioned.

Questions we help you answer

  • Does the system evidence actually support the allegation?
  • Is there a legitimate explanation for the timing or a late entry?
  • Were alerts and results handled reasonably given the volume and context?
  • What are our real exposures, and where is the case strong?
  • How do we rebut a plaintiff informatics or timeline theory?

What you get

  • Independent medical record and informatics review
  • Timeline reconciliation with context for disputed timing
  • Rebuttal analysis of opposing expert opinions
  • Written reports, and deposition or trial testimony where appropriate

Relevant services

Where we usually start.

Physician Case Review keeps consulting and testifying roles distinct, does not provide legal advice or guarantee outcomes, and runs a conflict check before any engagement.