Who we help
Plaintiff Attorneys
Find what the printed chart leaves out.
Plaintiff medical-malpractice and complex personal-injury cases often turn on what the printed chart does not show: when a note was created, whether a result was viewed, which alerts fired, and whether the documented sequence matches what actually happened. Physician Case Review helps you find that evidence, understand it, and present it clearly.
How we help
What Physician Case Review does for you.
Reconstruct the patient journey
A source-of-truth timeline across encounters, providers, orders, results, medications, alerts, and handoffs, built from the clinical record and the native EHR evidence behind it.
Surface overlooked evidence
Audit logs, metadata, alert activity, order-set versions, and results-viewing records that a standard record production leaves behind, read by a physician who is also a board-certified informaticist.
Sharpen discovery
A specific, defensible list of the native data, audit trails, and configuration records to request, and in what form, so the evidence is preserved and reviewed before depositions.
Test the case theory
An early, candid merit assessment of clinical plausibility, standard-of-care concerns, causation issues, and whether informatics evidence is likely to add value.
Explain it to a jury
De-identified timelines, care-path diagrams, and audit-trail visuals that make a complex healthcare sequence understandable.
Questions we help you answer
- •What actually happened, and in what order?
- •What did the printed chart omit?
- •Was a critical result ever opened or acknowledged?
- •Were alerts fired and overridden at the decision point?
- •Was documentation late, backdated, or copied forward?
- •What should we request in discovery, and how?
What you get
- •Case merit review and discovery-priorities list
- •Patient journey and EHR timeline reconstruction
- •Audit-log findings memo
- •Trial and mediation visuals
- •Written reports, and deposition or trial testimony where appropriate
Relevant services
Where we usually start.
Analysis is grounded in the evidence and stated with appropriate certainty. Physician Case Review does not provide legal advice or guarantee outcomes, and every engagement begins with a conflict check.